Our website use cookies to improve and personalize your experience and to display advertisements (if any). Our website may also include cookies from third parties like Google Adsense, Google Analytics, Youtube. By using the website, you consent to the use of cookies. We have updated our Privacy Policy. Please click on the button to check our Privacy Policy.

When Tehran’s message reaches Asia through Tokyo

The message published this week by the Embassy of Iran in Japan is not merely another piece of diplomatic propaganda. It is also a reflection of the gradual transformation of the global geopolitical narrative.

The Iranian statement portrays Tehran as a besieged power that, despite sanctions, wars, and Western pressure, continues to resist while repeatedly opting for diplomacy. The United States is depicted as the true destabilizing force in the Middle East: a power that imposes sanctions, sabotages negotiations, and routinely relies on military pressure as an instrument of foreign policy.

This narrative is not new. What is new is the international context in which it now circulates. Only a few years ago, a message of this kind would likely have remained confined to the margins of Western international discourse. Today, however, the situation is different. Prolonged wars, the fragmentation of the global order, and growing international fatigue with permanent US interventions have eroded part of the moral authority Washington maintained for decades.

What is most interesting is that this discourse does not appear primarily aimed at convincing the West. Its real audience is likely Asia, the Global South, and those countries increasingly uncomfortable with escalating great-power rivalry and its economic and energy consequences.

The fact that this message is being conveyed specifically from Japan is not insignificant either. Relations between Tokyo and Tehran have historically been more pragmatic and stable than those maintained by many other US allies. Despite its close alliance with Washington, Japan has traditionally sought to preserve communication channels with Iran, fully aware of its dependence on Gulf energy supplies and the need to avoid permanent escalation in the region.

In this context, the recent passage through the Persian Gulf of a Japan-related vessel carrying four Japanese crew members, following weeks of maritime tensions in the area, was described by the Japanese government as a “positive development.” The detail may seem minor, but it reflects how central the stability of the Strait of Hormuz remains for Japan and for much of Asia’s economies.

Iran is fully aware of this reality. And it likely also understands that, in the current international climate, projecting an image of diplomatic rationality toward Asian countries may be just as important as any demonstration of military strength.

Because today’s struggle is not only military or economic. It is also narrative. Who appears before the world as the actor willing to negotiate, and who appears as the power still privileging pressure, sanctions, and permanent confrontation.

And in this battle over the global narrative, Tehran believes the current international context is far more favorable to its position than it was in the past.

By Josep Solano

Journalist, writer and academic. Editor-in-chief of Diplomacy & Business and lecturer at UOC. Analyzing the social, political, and economic shifts of Japan and specialist in the political and economic landscape of the Pacific region and Europe.

Related Posts